[Boatanchors] Gonset G76
Peter Markavage
manualman at juno.com
Sun Sep 7 14:58:32 EDT 2008
I know what you mean Glen. A lot of them were done a mimeograph type
machines. Some of the early Clegg (Zeus and Interceptor) stuff was done
that way too. A number of the early Gonset schematics were also on
"Engineering type sheets" typically 4S or 6S size. Those sheets had the
typical "vinegar"-type smell and, if you exposed them to bright light,
over time, the paper got darker and darker. In the early 70's, some
manufactuers actually used Dennison "wet" copiers to produce copies. Each
sheet actually came out wet and you had to put it aside to let it dry to
avoid smearing. If you put of bunch of sheets together with a staple in
the corner, the odds of all the sheets automatically rolling up into a
scroll were very good. Fun stuff.
Pete, wa2cwa
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Glen Zook <gzook at yahoo.com>
writes:
> The original was a Gonset produced item and, yes, the lines are NOT
> properly aligned! I have run into such on other manuals as well.
> At least the original manual is not a mimeograph reproduction that
> many of the RME manuals were.
>
> Glen, K9STH
>
> Website: http://k9sth.com
>
>
> --- On Sun, 9/7/08, Peter Markavage <manualman at juno.com> wrote:
>
> From: Peter Markavage <manualman at juno.com>
>
> I looked at the GIF files and the DJVU file and saw no difference in
> the readability and line and print registration on the schematics.
> Wherever the original "schematic" that was scanned came from, it was
> most likely not a Gonset original since you can clearly see where
> individual sheet copies were butted adjacent to each other and
> secured. The "line" registration (line to line) between the sheets
> were way off. I have no original Gonset schematics, including the
> G-76, that look that way.
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list