[Boatanchors] TURBO RANGER FS

[Ken]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken" <n5cm at rtconline.com>
To: "RAY FRIESS" <rayfrijr at msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] TURBO RANGER FS


 Hi Ray & Gang,
 
 Consider us very senior senior citizens. Many of us do not have perfect
 hearing. Add to that less than good quality transmissions and we have
 a problem worse than if the audio is "natural", the natural human voice!
 
 I prefer my partner in a QSO sound human!
 FWIW,
 
 Ken   N5CM
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "RAY FRIESS" <rayfrijr at msn.com>
> To: "Dee Almquist" <w4pnt at highspeedlink.net>; <johnson at mailman.qth.net>
> Cc: <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>; <boatanchors at listserv.tempe.gov>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:19 PM
> Subject: RE: [Boatanchors] TURBO RANGER FS
> 
> 
> 
> You know .. I worked in broadcast radio for over 30  years.   I am still
> trying to figure out WHY so many
> ham operators insist on having or are so enamored with having broadcast
> quality audio on their rigs, whether
> new rigs or boatanchors.
> 
> If someone wants to be in broadcast radio, go into broadcast radio.  We
> arent shortwave broadcasters or
> commercial broadcasters.   We're hobbyists with the goal being to
> communicate with each other, not to broadcast
> symphony orchestras or the latest rock and roll.
> 
> I'm not complaining ....   I'm just wondering and commenting.   The
> motivation is a real puzzler....
 
 
 
 

-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 1029 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len