[Boatanchors] SB-220 in AM service
jeremy-ca
km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Wed Mar 12 18:01:44 EST 2008
Hmmm, maybe 200W of plate dissipation and 500W out on AM? Id love to see
that on a spectrum analyzer!
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "RAY FRIESS" <rayfrijr at msn.com>
To: "Jim Wiley" <jwiley at alaska.net>; "rbethman" <rbethman at comcast.net>
Cc: "Boatanchors Mail List" <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>;
<ke7kk at earthlink.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:18 PM
Subject: RE: [Boatanchors] SB-220 in AM service
That's one good thing about the old Palomar amps ... like the 300. 6 sweep
tubes (two driving 4) and
you can get almost 500 watts out AM with only 40 or 50 watts drive.
A little "redoing" to prevent spurious emissions and it's a great sounding
half KW.
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:09:00 -0800> From: jwiley at alaska.net> To:
> rbethman at comcast.net> Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] SB-220 in AM service> CC:
> boatanchors at mailman.qth.net; ke7kk at earthlink.net> > I use an old Drake
> L-4B in AM service, and have used it for more than 20 > years, with no
> failures - and the same set of tubes. I usually set it > for about 350
> watts unmodulated carrier output (the max allowable is > 375 watts, which
> which with modulation equals 1500 watts PEP). I tend > to be long winded,
> but the L-4B is a continuous duty rated amp, and was > built properly. It
> has a pair of 3-500Z tubes, a squirrel cage blower, > chimneys on the
> tubes, tube sockets in a pressurized plenum, plus a > separate power
> supply that can really take some guff. > > > The SB-220 should be OK at
> 250 watts or so out, as long as you limit > continuous talk time to 10
> minutes or less , with no more than a 50% > overall duty cycle. Keep your
> eye (or nose?) on the transformer - if it > starts to smell hot, back off
> on the talk time. For a test, I ran the > L-4B on 20 meters at 1000 watts
> output for a hour into a dummy load - > other than the power supply
> starting to smell a bit warm, and the tubes > getting sort of orange, no
> problems.> > > Before the rules for AM changed, I used to run it at about
> 400 watts > carrier output, mostly on 10 meters AM, also with no problems.
> However, > I did manage to unsolder the connections inside an external
> low-pass > filter doing that. > > > Good luck. Maybe I will hear you on
> the band once I get my 10-meter > antenna back up. > > > - Jim, KL7CC> > >
> > >>> Greetings Anchor People> >>>> >>> The Heath SB-220 in the shack is
> seldom used and I would like to use > >>> it in> >>> AM linear mode with
> low power exciters such as the Heath DX-60, Knight> >>> T-60, HT-32 / 37,
> HX-500, WRL DSB-100 etc. As its rated for 1KW CW > >>> RTTY> >>> (10 Min
> max) I thought that 250W input on AM should not stress the > >>> power>
> >>> supply or tubes, in the low power position (graphite tubes) At 60%>
> >>> efficiency that should be approx. 150W rf output. Any thoughts from >
> >>> others> >>> who have used the Amp on AM ? Thanks for your input Bill
> KE7KK SD> > Bob Bethman/NØDGN/BC-610/Northern Radio SP-600 Manassas, VA -
> > > MultiBand Dipoles> >> >
> _______________________________________________> >> >>
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list