[Boatanchors] Hammerlund Recievers?

[Bob Macklin]

Pete,

The NC-109 was my 3rd receiver. And my first new one. 1960. I used it on 10M
a lot with 6M and 2M converters.

I have an SX-110 that is not worth much above 20M either.

In any case I would consider building a converter for the bands above 20M.
Since they are single conversion except the NC-183.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
"Real Radios Glow in the Dark"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Markavage" <manualman at juno.com>
To: <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Hammerlund Recievers?


> NC-109 was my first receiver. Deaf above 14 MHz. CW notes always had an
> annoying ring to them. Wasn't very stable, but on AM, probably won't make
> a big difference.
> Pete, wa2cwa
> http://www.manualman.com
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:50:29 -0800 "Bob Macklin" <macklinbob at msn.com>
> writes:
> > How about some comment about Hammerlund receivers. We had our BIG
> > hamfest in about 3 weeks and I am looking for new (to me) GC
> > receiver. My first choice is a NC-109 or a NC-98. But those seem to
> > be rare except on eBay. If I see a NC-183 I may take it.
> >
> > But there are always lots of Hammerlund receivers. I may consider
> > one of them.
> >
> > It's not for SSB use. Just CW/AM.
> >
> > Bob Macklin
> > K5MYJ
> > Seattle, Wa,
> > "Real Radios Glow in the Dark"
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
>