[Boatanchors] 955 socket?
Troglodite at aol.com
Troglodite at aol.com
Sat Jan 29 11:42:49 EST 2005
In a message dated 1/28/2005 6:16:28 P.M. Central Standard Time,
brianclarke01 at optusnet.com.au writes:
I did that too. The 958 wouldn't quite cut the mustard. And, I found that
the Tx
and Rx frequencies were slightly different, using the 958A in Rx as a
super-regen. So, I designed up a base station with those different
frequencies
in it and then all the hand-helds could talk back to base. I used a 3S4, as
I
recall, as the detector/AF amplifier/modulator in a reflex circuit. Crikey,
that
brings back memories! All in a box about 9" x 3" x 1.5". The biggest part,
apart from the 19" antenna, was the 67V5 battery.
We discovered this T/R frequency difference right away when we built the
first two. Each of us would tune to the other, and gradually we walked right out
of the band. The solution, if I recall correctly, was to add a resistor in
the B+ line to the 958 when it was switched to receive mode. This shifted the
frequency just enough so that it matched the transmit mode. The value of the
resistor was determined by experiment. These things were very simple, no
crystal control, AM and FM modulation at the same time. But in the early 50's,
they served the purpose.
I still have a pair of Abbot TR-4's that one day may serve to demonstrate
the kind of gear that was used by WERS. (War Emergency Radio Service) The last
descendent of this type of radio was probably the Heath "Lunchbox" 6 and 2
meter rigs, which used a supperregen receiver. Nowadays, few people are familiar
with that "rush" sound, but the old superregen had great sensitivity and
excellent noise immunity for it's simplicity. With a simple preamp to isolate
the antenna, it was quite useable. Without the isolation, you ran the risk of
losing some of your friends that had more sophisticated gear in the same band.
:-)
73,
Doug Moore KB9TMY (Formerly K6HWY)
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list