[Boatanchors] Receiver WTB
Vic K2VCO
vic at rakefet.com
Mon Dec 26 12:08:09 EST 2005
WØQFC wrote:
> The HQ-140X is the closest "match" to my Globe Chief 90A and the price is in
> my range.
> I have always liked Hallicrafters and that also creates a problem with which
> one to choose, SX-28, SX-99, SX-100 or the SX-111?
> Now, I would appreciate one more thing from the list;
> Which Hallicrafters would YOU pick, based on how good the receiver is for CW
> and how well you like it overall?
Disclaimer: What follows is my *personal opinion* based on receivers
that I have used. Everyone's mileage may vary. I'm not interested in
arguing, this is just what one guy thinks:
Hallicrafters made stylish equipment, but the lower priced units were,
for the most part, junk. The SX-99 is very unstable, a small step above
a BC rx (it has a crystal filter). The SX-28 is built a little better
mechanically, but is much older and probably will require more work to
get it in shape. The HQ-140X is probably a better choice than either of
the above. I haven't used the SX-100 or 111, so I can't comment.
My idea of a good CW receiver is a National HRO. In addition to good
mechanical design and construction, it's simple and easy to work on.
Collins, of course, knew how to build solid receivers, but they are
expensive.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list