[Boatanchors] 6211 = 12AX7 ? 12AU7?

Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:46:47 -0600

According to one of my "sub" books, the 6211 is same animal as the old 6J6.
73,
Sandy W5TVW
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ross Hochstrasser" <[email protected]>
To: "Sheldon Daitch" <[email protected]>; "Bill Beech" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] 6211 = 12AX7 ? 12AU7?


| Hi,
|   Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the 7025 a substitute for the 12AX7?? I
| think the 6211 might be a 12AT7. Ross
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Sheldon Daitch" <[email protected]>
| To: "Bill Beech" <[email protected]>
| Cc: <[email protected]>
| Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 9:35 AM
| Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] 6211 = 12AX7 ? 12AU7?
| 
| 
| > I am really going to show my ignorance here, but weren't there at least
| > one four digit tube identifier for a tube that looked like a
| > 12AU7/12AX7, same dual triode, same mechanical look, designed
| > specifically for either vacuum tube flip-flop or multivibrator use, way
| > back where there were vacuum tube "computers?"
| >
| > Is this 6211 possibly one of these units?
| >
| > Sheldon
| >
| > Bill Beech wrote:
| > >
| > > Bob,
| > >
| > > According to my tube data, that is neither a 12AU7 nor a 12AX7.  It has
| > > lower plate voltage ratings than either of those.  I hold no
| > > replacements for it.
| > >
| > > 73,
| > > Bill, NJ7P
| > >
| > > www.nj7p.org
| > > herford.ampr.org
| > >
| > > _______________________________________________
| > > Boatanchors mailing list
| > > [email protected]
| > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
| > _______________________________________________
| > Boatanchors mailing list
| > [email protected]
| > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
| 
| _______________________________________________
| Boatanchors mailing list
| [email protected]
| http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
| 
|