[Boatanchors] 6211 = 12AX7 ? 12AU7?

Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:20:46 -0500

Ross, your rite. 7025 = 12AX7.
I was in a hurry and these were of the top off my head. Thank you for the
correction.
by the way, 6211 = 2013
Regards
Gary...WZ1M

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Hochstrasser" <[email protected]>
To: "Sheldon Daitch" <[email protected]>; "Bill Beech" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] 6211 = 12AX7 ? 12AU7?

> Hi,
>   Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the 7025 a substitute for the 12AX7??
I
> think the 6211 might be a 12AT7. Ross
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sheldon Daitch" <[email protected]>
> To: "Bill Beech" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 9:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] 6211 = 12AX7 ? 12AU7?
>
>
> > I am really going to show my ignorance here, but weren't there at least
> > one four digit tube identifier for a tube that looked like a
> > 12AU7/12AX7, same dual triode, same mechanical look, designed
> > specifically for either vacuum tube flip-flop or multivibrator use, way
> > back where there were vacuum tube "computers?"
> >
> > Is this 6211 possibly one of these units?
> >
> > Sheldon
> >
> > Bill Beech wrote:
> > >
> > > Bob,
> > >
> > > According to my tube data, that is neither a 12AU7 nor a 12AX7.  It
has
> > > lower plate voltage ratings than either of those.  I hold no
> > > replacements for it.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Bill, NJ7P
> > >
> > > www.nj7p.org
> > > herford.ampr.org
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Boatanchors mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> > _______________________________________________
> > Boatanchors mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
>