[Boatanchors] Re: [Heathkit] Mail ListChanges

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:17:46 -0500

Good afternoon Miguel,

To put it another way, "The grass is always greener on the other side of
the fence", not in reference better times in the past, but the fact that
the other way always seems to look better.

Regarding Bobs post, if he wanted it to go to all those lists in the
first place, then if the response is valid for one list, wouldn't it be
just as valid for all the lists? If not, what criteria would let us
decide what list you would want to respond and which one you wouldn't
want to respond? If a person posts to all those lists and the response
is worthy for response to one list, then it should probably go back to
all lists.

But, as they say, you can't please everyone.......... 

Very best regards, Ray  W2EC

Miguel Bravo wrote:
> 
> I agree. But if you still (as before) try reply to all, then you (could)
> made a wide repply because you will reply to ALL the original sender
> address. I.E. try "reply to all " to the last one of Bob Wilder (QSL design)
> and you can see how many list he is a member.
> 
> As we say in Spanish (and I know Duane undestand it) "Todo tiempo pasado fu�
> mejor".
> 
> Miguel Bravo
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ray, W2EC" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; "List-Hallicrafters"
> <[email protected]>; "List-Boatanchors"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:27 PM
> Subject: [Boatanchors] Re: [Heathkit] Mail ListChanges
> 
> > It would be nice for us frogs to have a choice:
> >
> > jump North (Reply To: the sender)
> >  or
> > jump South (Reply All: the list)
> >
> > instead of:
> >
> > jump North (Reply To: the list)
> >  or
> > jump South (Reply All: the list)
> >
> > Why does this seem so difficult to comprehend??????????????
> >
> >
> > 73, Ray  W2EC
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors