> This one says it's not too good: > http://www.natworld.com/ars/pages/back_issues/2001_text/0601_text/pc500_intr > o.html ............................................................................ . See the AE4HL comment here..... http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1323 Apparently the reviewed unit was fubar and that wasn't known until after the review. K7DFW ..._._