[BARC-List] Radio Traffic during Sept. 11 tragedy
Arthur N1NHZ
[email protected]
Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:36:34 -0500
My Holiday Hopes for You
=================
For Bygone Days
Glad Memories
For Present Days
Hearty Greetings
For Future Days
Bright Hopes
=================
Hi, All. There is a lesson to be learned here by all hams who are
concerned about disaster/emergency radio communications. Please keep the
following in mind during drills and real life events.
===========================================================
Sept. 11 Probers Look at Emergency Radios
December 2, 2003 04:34 PM EST
WASHINGTON - Concerns about the effectiveness of emergency radios on Sept.
11 have focused on technological flaws, but probers on Tuesday identified
another problem: too many people trying to talk at once.
The overwhelming rush of radio transmissions by emergency personnel
responding to the World Trade Center may have cut off one-third to one-half
of radio calls, according to preliminary findings by the National Institute
of Standards and Technology.
NIST is examing the construction and evacuation procedures of the towers.
Communications breakdowns among rescue personnel have been blamed for
slowing the evacuation of office workers and rescuers, but most of the
complaints have centered around poorly-designed equipment or spotty
reception in the 110-story buildings.
NIST investigators, offering an update on their long-running inquiry, said
the radio systems "experienced surge load conditions after the attack."
The condition existed on systems of the Port Authority, which operated the
complex and has its own police force, and the New York City police and fire
department personnel which rushed to the scene.
"Traffic volume made it difficult to handle the flow and delivery of
information," the NIST report said. "Multiple, concurrent radio
transmissions on the same frequency, or doubling, made it more difficult.
"It is estimated that roughly a third to a half of the communications were
not complete due to surge load conditions."
Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator on the project, said it was still too
early to say how much of the overall communications problems experienced
that day can be blamed on "doubling," which is caused by too many people
trying to talk at once on the same frequency.
Shyam said the radio systems were probably not designed to carry the heavy
load of traffic caused by such an extreme emergency.
NIST probers have reviewed much of the radio traffic among the Port
Authority and some of the city's rescue services, Sunder said.
The group has not yet finished its analysis of all the transponders,
devices used to relay emergency radio broadcasts where reception is poor,
as in skyscrapers.
In the wake of the attacks, the federal government has pushed local
authorities to find ways to allow different responders, like fire, police,
and emergency medical personnel, to talk effectively to each other.
IST's initial results suggest another danger may lie in allowing too many
people to talk at once, clogging frequencies.
Sunder said his group is also seeking additional information on work done
in 1964 by the Port Authority showing the towers could survive the impact
of a 707 jetliner.
The modern planes that struck the building in 2001 are about 20 percent
bigger than a Boeing 707, but the investigator said the Port Authority's
analysis is still important because the 1964 scenario was "strikingly
similar" to the events of Sept. 11, and might lead investigators to
determine where the old analysis was faulty.
Sunder said the group has obtained two "white papers" referring to the
early work, but cannot find the corresponding calculations and analysis,
records of which were presumably destroyed in the building collapse.
---
On the Net:
National Institute for Standards and Technology: http://www.nist.gov
======================================================================
de Arthur N1NHZ, 73
Boston (MA) Amateur Radio Club
Membership Services Committee at Work
One full member AND 120 associate members
Please visit: http://www.aabb.eboard.com
For additional information