This has been such a fascinating and informative discussion! I never realized that the much lower IF was essentially a down-converter workaround for the triodes they used. Thanks, everyone! 

I have a 1933 Gilfillan 105 lowboy that belonged to a Great Uncle. it is built (If I recall correctly without the schematic handy) as a triple TRF front end with a fixed regen detector/amp feeding the AF output. You vary the volume by bleeding some of the 1st TRF output to ground. 

I don’t know if I’ll ever get it running before I stop running 😄. It was got-at a long time ago by someone who knew just enuf to really mess things up.

Jim Falls K6FWT 

On Jan 7, 2023, at 15:57, Hubert Miller <[email protected]> wrote:



I don’t know the Kolster circuit but I can tell you, RCA never made any direction finding receiver that used a regenerative detector.
I have a pretty good stock of reference material on RCA communications products if you want to contest that.

 

The problem I see with the regenerative detector for direction finding is that its use requires much more attention to task, more skill.

The regeneration level between low signal strength and maximum signal strength may need readjusting, or else there is a kind of limiting

action, that is, nonlinear gain with signal strength, which may be a problem. This ( I think, anyway ) is a confusing factor, like using AGC

when trying to DF. It CAN be done, but more time consuming and more likely to contain inaccuracy. It occurs to me at this moment that

the gridleak detector, with a larger signal, will have more negative bias on the control grid, hence a kind of control against gain. Perhaps

this is why the advice on using regen receivers for CW, when the regen is advanced just beyond the most sensitive point of operation, there

will be a “leveling” effect on all signals.

 

I am thinking now of a German WW2 era receiver used for both communications and airfield DF use. I think this is the EP-2 / HE-1 receiver

with a tuning range of something like 75 – 3700 kHz. ( I still have one to sell, which I need to pull out of storage. ) It does use a regenerative

detector at 50 kHz IF. But as a superhet with an RF and IF stage,  the detector regeneration effect can be turned way down and the receiver

still function as a nonregenerative circuit. The regenerative detector in the superhet receiver was something only the Germans and Japanese

used, and even there it was not usual.

 

Some of you readers may have tried the regenerative IF stage trick, like on the “Command Sets” receivers. I think most people who tried this

found it very unsatisfactory. Having one control that affects both selectivity and gain at the same time is an annoying experience. The separate

Q-multiplier as I recall, has mostly eliminated this complication.

-Hue Miller

______________________________________________________________
ARC5 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html