On 1/7/2023 7:37 AM, [email protected] wrote:
I had always assumed that;

1.  The TRF set is essentially a Superhet IF.
2.  The TRF has some major disadvantages for multiband sets, like the big clunky coils of my RU receiver 
3.  The TRF had to cost more to build than the Superhet, given that complex tuning mechanism.
4.  Hence the Superhet.

Now, since they used CW a great deal in those thrilling days of yesteryear, how did they receive it on a TRF set?

Wayne
WB5WSV

I don't track non-aircraft developments much, but there were two methods I've seen, one developed by Aircraft Radio Corporation for the Navy sets and another by the Signal Corps. 

The ARC design introduced a circuit called the audio heterodyne oscillator, described in this simple? explanation below:







The second method was the RC-12 oscillator/detector, described in these two files on my website:

https://aafradio.org/docs/Oscillator_Equipment_RC-12_(BC-RC-183).pdf
https://aafradio.org/garajmahal/BC-RC-183_Mount.html

The SCR-183/283 sets didn't have an audio heterodyne oscillator like the Navy sets, so the Signal Corps did the next best thing - made a separate box to do the job in larger aircraft.  It wasn't so great in a single seat fighter...



73,
Mike  KC4TOS