[ARC5] Transistorized LM
Tom Lee
tomlee at ee.stanford.edu
Sat Aug 30 19:54:47 EDT 2025
I'd state it a little bit differently: A pentode generally has a higher
output resistance than a JFET, but not a triode. Similarly JFETs
certainly can have more or less gm than a tube; it depends on the JFET
and on the bias current.
It is perhaps most helpful to think of a JFET as similar to a triode. A
pentode is a lot like a cascoded pair of JFETs -- the output resistance
will be high, and the Miller effect will be low. The "FETRON" was an
attempt to replace pentodes using a (quasi) cascode pair and worked just
fine in many cases.
As to bias sensitivity, a JFET's gm allegedly varies as the square root
of drain current, while a vacuum tube's gm varies roughly as the
cube-root of plate current. Not quite the same, but most circuits of the
era were designed to tolerate a fair spread in vacuum tube
characteristics and that has facilitated their conversion to JFETs (and
sometimes even to junction transistors).
-- Cheers,
Tom
On 8/30/2025 4:21 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> There are some 1980’s articles about doing this sort of thing. They
> are not LM / BC-221 specific. They get more into the pretty
> significant differences between FET’s and tubes. Yes, it’s been a
> while … my recollection:
>
> Even a pretty simple FET has way more Gm than the tubes used in these
> radios / instruments. It’s pretty easy to get way more gain than the
> design was targeted for. This is not generally a good thing ….
>
> A tube has a *way* larger output resistance than any FET you can get (
> so it’s much closer to an ideal current source). This can impact the Q
> of the output circuit. In combination with the higher Gm, it just
> might still seem like it all works ok.
>
> A Pentode has a lot lower feedback capacitance that the typical FET.
> There used to be some mosfets that got closer. Even by the 1980’s then
> had become hard to find.
>
> Yes, there was a lot more to it. I believe Ham Radio ran the articles.
> I’d be amazed if I got that all correct ….
>
> Bob
>
>
>> On Aug 30, 2025, at 6:44 PM, J Mcvey via ARC5 <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> You might have problems finding some of those fets.
>> I used BF244b and J310 fets when I was transistorizing a R392.
>> You could use a single dual gate mosfet for the mixer rather than the
>> double fet shown.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, August 30, 2025 at 04:42:05 PM EDT, Brooke via ARC5
>> <arc5 at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Ken:
>>
>> Thanks. Here's some links:
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/73-magazine-1971-05/page/60/mode/1up
>> https://ia600403.us.archive.org/6/items/73-magazine-1971-05/05_May_1971.pdf#page=61
>> https://prc68.com/I/USM159.html#LM_18_Frequency_Meter
>> --
>> Have Fun,
>>
>> Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
>> https://www.PRC68.com <https://www.prc68.com/>
>> axioms:
>> 1. The extent to which you can fix or improve something will be limited by how well you understand how it works.
>> 2. Everybody, with no exceptions, holds false beliefs.
>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> 73 magazine for May 1971 has an article on this, for those interested.
>>>
>>> Entitled, "The Transistorized LM Freq Meter", starting on page 60.
>>>
>>> I was recently given two, supposedly non-working, LMs. They don't look all that bad to me.
>>>
>>> I'll see if I can make them work.
>>>
>>> Ken W7EKB
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> ARC5 mailing list
>>> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5 <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5>
>>> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>
>>> Post:mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net <mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net>
>>>
>>> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net/>
>>> Please help support this email list:https://www.qsl.net/donate.html <https://www.qsl.net/donate.html>
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ARC5 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ARC5 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post:mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20250830/4507b40c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list