[ARC5] ARR-2 (ZBX) vs ARR-1/ZB/ZB-1/ZB-2/ZB-3

[J Mcvey]

 They all worked with the same carrier and modulation frequencies, so the only difference was the implementation hardware.

    On Saturday, March 23, 2024 at 06:14:15 AM EDT, <zakariya.abu at yandex.com> wrote:  
 
 Colleagues,

Thank you very much indeed for your contributions. I think that we can 
safely assume that the ZBX was the AN/ARR-2.

73

Jan
SP5XZG

W dniu 23.03.2024 o 04:13, Jack Antonio pisze:
> A picture of my AN/ARR-2. The receiver could be
> installed together with AN/ARC-5 equipment, or could
> be set up as a separate standalone system.
> 
> Found a reference in SHIPS 242A of 1945 (available on
> Nicks website, navy-radio.com) that states that the ZBX
> was redesignated AN/ARR-2.
> 
> I tend to believe that by 1945, the term ZB or ZBX just came
> to used as a shorthand notation to describe any of the
> sets for this system, regardless of the actual designation.
> 
> Jack Antonio
> WA7DIA
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
ARC5 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20240323/1bc07710/attachment-0001.html>