[ARC5] Added detail re 1700kc xtal ask

Tom Lee tomlee at ee.stanford.edu
Tue Jun 18 16:01:01 EDT 2024


Hi Mike,

You may wish to consider a different IF for which rocks are more readily 
available (as I was typing this, I saw Steve J's reply pointing out yet 
another reason for considering a different IF). For instance, there are 
tons of chroma subcarrier crystals for NTSC andPAL. I see these going 
for $0.20 in quantities of 10 from Digikey, making it easy to buy a bag 
from which to find a good set of matched ones. A higher IF would also 
give you improved image rejection as an additional benefit. Would that 
be an option at all for you?

--Tom

-- 
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
420 Via Palou Mall
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070
http://www-smirc.stanford.edu

On 6/18/2024 11:43 AM, Mike Kana wrote:
> Hi all
> This is for a crystal filter. The RX designs I’m looking at are th HBR Rx or the 6-4 from the 1964 hand book
> If the xtal isn’t exactly 1700, a few KC either side would require some VFO trickery.
> Thx
> Mike
>
> Warning!  This is transmitted over a non secure medium
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post:mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20240618/662a4c3a/attachment.html>


More information about the ARC5 mailing list