[ARC5] [Milsurplus] RU receiver question
howard holden
holden7471 at msn.com
Fri Oct 20 14:12:01 EDT 2023
Agreed with Ken on the RAL. I used one at the USS Ling for some 10 years. An amazing receiver for one designed in the 30s, and even SSB is easy to copy on it. CW is a snap. Crisp, clean, and pretty easy to separate signals. My impression is you “drive” an RAL. How you drive it says a lot.
Howie WB2AWQ Reno NV
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
From: Ken<mailto:kgordon2006 at frontier.com>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2023 9:11 AM
To: David Stinson<mailto:arc5 at ix.netcom.com>; Hubert Miller<mailto:Kargo_cult at msn.com>; 'ARC-5'<mailto:arc5 at mailman.qth.net>; milsurplus at mailman.qth.net<mailto:milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [ARC5] [Milsurplus] RU receiver question
Well, although I have never, yet, used an RU, I DID use an RAL-7 as my main and only station receiver for some 12 years.
I believe the circuitry is very similar: a 6 tube TRF: 2 RF amp stages, a regenerative detector, 2 stages of audio, and an "AVC" (a limiter).
The RAL-7 was designed by RCA. It covers from 300 kHz through 23 MHz.
I never had any trouble separating AM, CW, or SSB stations with it. The user simply has to learn how to use the regeneration control.
I really liked the receiver. For one thing, it has this "transparent" sound: there didn't seem like there was much between you and the signals on the band.
Ken W7EKB
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20231020/95ce1fd1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list