[ARC5] BC-453 in the SCR-274N Configuration
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Fri Feb 24 18:53:27 EST 2023
Well, the ZB units were used with the R-24/ARC-5 and the BC-946B both of which covered
the 520 to 1500 kHz frequency range. The R-23/ARC-5 and BC-453 did not cover the
required frequency range and so were never used with the ZB units.
Both the R-23/ARC-5 and the R-24/ARC-5, and the BC-453 were listed as "navigation"
receivers. I don't know if the BC-946B was ever so included.
Ken W7EKB
On 24 Feb 2023 at 15:51, MARK DORNEY via ARC5 wrote:
>
> The USN used the ARR-1 ( ZB-1,ZB-2,ZB-3 ) and ARR-2 starting in the 1930´s to guide
> aircraft back to carriers after a mission. The ARR-1 types were used withe the RU type
> receivers, the ARB Receivers, and the ARA and ARC-5 type navigational receivers until
> replaced by the ARR-1 was replaced in the ARA-ARC-5 receivers by the ARR-2 starting
> in 1943 The ARR-1 was fit to either the ARA/ARC-5 ( and SCR-274 ) by receivers using
> several control boxes and a mount separate from the ARA/ARC-5/SCR-274 receiver.
> The ARR-2 eliminated the need for the separate control boxes and separate mount in
> the ARA/ARC-5/SRC-274 receivers. The ARB receiver also did not use the separate
> control boxes for the ZB-1 homing device and the deceive itself clipped onto the top of
> the ARB receiver, as it did with the RU type receivers. The Antenna on the YE
> transmitter on the carrier rotated, and sent out a different Morse code letter every 30
> degrees of rotation using a "U" shaped directional antenna ( the "Hay Rake" ). The
> signal was modulated in such a way as to make the signal undetectable unless you had
> the correct receiver set correctly. Declassified in 1947, the system stayed in use by the
> USN until 1960 when it was replaced by VOR and TACAN.
>
> Mark D.
> WW2RDO
>
> "In matters of style, float with the current. In matters of Principle, stand like a rock.
> ". - Thomas Jefferson
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 24, 2023, at 3:22 PM, Bart Lee <bart.lee.k6vk at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
> "a switch that when pulled out set the radio to 276 Kc."
>
> What was that frequency at the time? A standard airfield A-N?
>
> We have, at the CHRS Museum, a BC-1206 but not an R76-ARR-13.
>
> Nice pix!
>
> 73
>
> ##
> -- --
> Bart Lee, K6VK, CHRS Archivist and Fellow, AWA Fellow, ARRL Liaison
>
> Texts only to: 415 902 7168
>
> www.bartlee.com
>
> {Bart(dot)Lee(dot)K6VK(at)gmail(dot)com}
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 9:54 AM Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb at gmail.com> wrote:
> The P-51 Pilot Training Manual dated 15 Aug 1945 mentions only the SCR-522 (which makes
> sense as by that date it would have replaced the SCR-274N). The manual shows a Detrola LF
> receiver mounted on the lower right side of the cockpit. "The Detrola is a low-frequency
> receiver. It operates between 200 and 400 Kc, which covers the transmission band for towers
> and range stations through the United States."
>
> I have no doubt that a BC-1206 could be used in place of the Detrola as visually they look to be
> about the same size.
>
> The BC-1206 was Setchell Carlson Model 524. The Model 512 was the R-76/ARR-13. It was
> similar to the 1206 but had a switch that when pulled out set the radio to 276 Kc. See attachment.
>
> Another important use of the BC-1206 and R-76 was they were used for ferry flights from the
> factory to the facility that installed the radios. It was a temporary installation.
>
> 73 Mark K3MSB
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 11:07 AM <releazer at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Before WWII and even up until the 1970's to a limited degree, AN ranges were used on low
> frequencies. These featured signals that gave a continuous tone if you were headed toward the
> station and an A (Dit Dah) tone or an N (Dah Dit) tone if you were off to one side. Light aircraft
> without even an electrical system could use the AN ranges for navigation, and also receive control
> tower instructions by employing battery powered receivers. Fighter aircraft generally did not have
> an ADF or even a loop antenna and so were equipped with LF receivers for the same
> reasons. When SCR-522 replaced the SCR-274-N or SCR-283 equipment small LF receivers
> were often installed in the cockpit to preserve the LF capability, such as the BC-1206 series made
> by Detrola, Setchell Carlson and others. It is not clear to me how often the BC-1206 equipment
> was retained for overseas use or how USAAF fighters in the UK homed in on their airfield
> beacons.
>
> Postwar the BC-1206 was replaced with BC-453 in many refurbished P-51's that had ARC-3 fitted
> and can be seen perched high above the ARC-3 equipment under the bubble canopy.
>
> Wayne
> WB5WSV
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the ARC5
mailing list