[ARC5] Fwd: T-23/ARC-5 antenna relay

[Michael Hanz]

Reduced drag.  Same reason for the teardrop cover for the loop 
antennas.  In essence, it was intended to mimic an aircraft wing without 
lift, so the cross section curve on each side is symmetrical.

On 11/11/2021 5:14 PM, J Mcvey wrote:
> It kind reminds me of machete. Why the blade design? Was it made that 
> way to stand up to the wind speed of the aircraft ?
>
> On Thursday, November 11, 2021, 02:39:55 PM EST, Michael Hanz 
> <aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org> wrote:
>
>
> Actually, both AN-74* and AN-104-* antennas were used by both Services 
> - just at different times.  The AN-74 came first and was more 
> expensive to make because it was a wrap around design with a crimp 
> along the length of the copper radiating surface.  It also had 
> problems with moisture getting under the metal and corroding the 
> crimp.  The AN-104 used a plated drawn steel radiating surface that 
> was pressed on over the wooden shaft.  Somewhere around here is a note 
> to continue using the AN-74 until supplies are exhausted.
>
> The Navy Airborne Radio Maintenance Notes (ARMN) dated November 1945 
> distinguishes between the two simply by calling the AN-74 the "old" 
> VHF antenna, as contrasted with the "latest" AN-104-A (and eventually 
> the -B series).  Turns out the AN-104 went through some growing pains 
> with corrosion as well, finally getting some relief with the -B model 
> that was plated with copper rather than iron.  (Or so said the ARMN).
>
> - Mike  KC4TOS
>
> AN-74:
>
>
> AN-104-A (NASM photo):
>
>
> On 11/11/2021 10:54 AM, MARK DORNEY via ARC5 wrote:
> AN-74 was the USAAF version. AN-104 was the USN version
>
> Mark D.
> WW2RDO
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From:* MARK DORNEY via ARC5 <arc5 at mailman.qth.net> 
>> <mailto:arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
>> *Date:* November 11, 2021 at 10:38:39 AM EST
>> *To:* Robert Downs <wa5cab at cs.com> <mailto:wa5cab at cs.com>
>> *Cc:* arc5 at mailman.qth.net <mailto:arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
>> *Subject:* *Re: [ARC5] T-23/ARC-5 antenna relay*
>>
>> 
> Thanks everybody.  I was able to sort out the antenna configuration 
> with the information you provided. The antenna is an AN-74.
>
> 73
> Mark D.
> WW2RDO
>
>
> “In matters of style, float with the current. In matters of Principle, 
> stand like a rock. “.   -   Thomas Jefferson
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 11, 2021, at 9:10 AM, Michael Hanz <aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org> 
>> <mailto:aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org> wrote:
>>
>> 
> The same relay was also used in the ARC VHF prototype set - 
> (RE-16/ARC-5 antenna relay, T-89/ARC-5, and T-90/ARC-5 transmitters) 
> and in the T-27/ARC-3.  So it got around...
> - Mike  KC4TOS
>
>
>
> On 11/11/2021 4:04 AM, Robert Downs via ARC5 wrote:
>> Yes.  The antenna relay for the T-23 and R-28 (and their SCR-274-N predecessors) was always mounted behind the top of the transmitter front panel.  There was never any separate VHF antenna relay unit as there was with all transmitter equipped versions of the MF/HF sets.  In both versions of the VHF sets, a short coaxial cable ran from the transmitter to the receiver.  And the VHF antenna was connected directly to the transmitter by a second coaxial cable.
>>
>> Robert Downs
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net  <mailto:arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net>  [mailto:arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net  <mailto:arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net>] On Behalf Of MARK DORNEY via ARC5
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 22:14
>> To:arc5 at mailman.qth.net  <mailto:arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
>> Subject: [ARC5] T-23/ARC-5 antenna relay
>>
>> Anybody have any idea what the T-23/ARC-5 and R-28 used for an antenna relay?  Antenna feed from the T-23 was coax, and the RE-2/ARC-5 antenna relay didn’t have a post to connect coaxial cable. If an adapter was used, any help identifying the adapter would be appreciated
>>
>> Mark D.
>> WW2RDO
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5 
> <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net <mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net>
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
> <https://www.qsl.net/donate.html>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5  <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5>
> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm  <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>
> Post:mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net  <mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net  <http://www.qsl.net>
> Please help support this email list:https://www.qsl.net/donate.html  <https://www.qsl.net/donate.html>
>
> -- 
> Michael Hanz - KC4TOS
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html

-- 
Michael Hanz - KC4TOS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20211111/458bda4c/attachment-0001.html>