[ARC5] US Submarine ELINT WWII, (was British ZB......?)
MARK DORNEY
mkdorney at aol.com
Thu Apr 8 17:36:36 EDT 2021
“Little Boy” used a a triple mechanical time fuse, not a radar fuse. ( and yes, I have some background in the use of this type of device ). . Not sure about “ Fat Man.
Mark D.
“In matters of style, float with the current. In matters of Principle, stand like a rock. “. - Thomas Jefferson
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 8, 2021, at 4:59 PM, Rich Post <kb8tad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Would that be the RDZ perhaps? Heavy, gray and yes, beautifully built. Bought one at the turn of the millennium at a swapfest and promptly passed it to the Museum of Radio & Technology where it is still holding down the floor.
>
> Rich KB8TAD
>
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:48 PM Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at frontier.com> wrote:
>> On 7 Apr 2021 at 15:11, Tim wrote:
>>
>> > Hue said: But by US standards Japanese radars were rudimentary, not widely deployed, and also
>> > ( without referring to my docs ) I believe mostly operated on lower frequency bands than US. It just
>> > seems rather less likely or certainly, uncommon
>> > [snip]
>>
>> Although SOME of their radars operated at around 3 gHz, most were lower frequencies, as I
>> remember it.
>>
>> I do remember reading a U.S. Army or Navy document concerning the installation of one their
>> radars on some Japanese capital ship. It was remarked that a rather large bundle of wires
>> were fed through a rather crude hole torched through at least one deck with no sort of
>> grommeting to protect the wires from chafing. A very poor installation of an important bit of
>> equipment.
>>
>> > --------------------------------
>> > Generally true.....US Subs used the AN/APR-1 (and -4 presumably) hunting IJN ships/submarines
>> > in the Pacific in WWII. ..In researching the AN/APR-1 that I am playing with I learned that the
>> > USS Batfish sank an IJN submarine after the APR-1 detected its 150 mc radar. Those IJN subs
>> > also carried 3 Gc radars, at least late-war. The APR-1 (SPR-1) could detect both radar band
>> > emissions. I would expect many other intercepts were made with this gear. It was a good passive
>> > system and the APR-4 variant was used well into the Vietnam war era aboard EB-66 aircraft,
>> > probably others.
>> > Some details if you're bored:
>> > http://www.n6cc.com/an-apr-1-apr-4-radar-comm-surveillance-receiver/
>>
>> Very interesting, Tim. Thank you for writing that web page
>>
>> I believe I own at least one of all of the tuning units used in the APR series of equipment. I
>> have an APR-1, and I also own two of those very large and very heavy Scott-built Navy
>> receivers which use those same tuning units, and I have, for the moment, forgotten their
>> Navy "name", RDO?....or something. They weigh at least 100 lubs and have never been
>> used. They are truly beautifully built. Once in a while, I slide one of them out of their cabinet
>> simply to drool over the beautiful, beautiful construction.
>>
>> I am tempted to ship at least one of them, at my cost, to anyone who really wants one.
>>
>> I'll never use either of them and would hate to see them go to the dump when I kick.
>>
>> I would suppose they belong on one of those museum ships...
>>
>> Ken W7EKB
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ARC5 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20210408/0c35e78d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list