[ARC5] US Submarine ELINT WWII, (was British ZB......?)
MICHAEL BITTNER
mmab at cox.net
Wed Apr 7 20:42:53 EDT 2021
The CQ "Surplus Schematics Handbook" refers to the APS-13 as a "forest of 6J6's". It was my first acquaintance with the wobbulator concept. Mike, W6MAB
> On April 7, 2021 at 7:50 PM D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Way back in 1964 or 1965 I bought an APS-13
> (probably from Fair Radio) for about $5 as a way
> to start my first "junk box." I got tubes, sockets,
> connectors, resistors, etc. Quite a bit of that stuff
> actually ended up in projects.
>
> 73 - Mac, K2GKK/5
> Since 30 Nov 1953
> Oklahoma City, OK
> USAF (Retired) 61-81
> FAA (Retired) 94-10
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> From: arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net <arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Gene Smar via ARC5 <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 18:30
> To: 'ARC-5 List' <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [ARC5] US Submarine ELINT WWII, (was British ZB......?)
>
> Speaking of Japan and RADARs, I’ve always thought it ironic that the APS-13 “Archie” tail warning RADAR was mated with the Yagi-Uda antenna as part of the altimeter fuze for both Little Boy and Fat Man.
>
> C’est la guerre.
>
>
> 73 de
> Gene Smar AD3F
>
> From: arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2021 6:12 PM
> To: Hubert Miller <Kargo_cult at msn.com>
> Cc: To: ARC-5 <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: [ARC5] US Submarine ELINT WWII, (was British ZB......?)
>
> Hue said: But by US standards Japanese radars were rudimentary, not widely deployed, and also ( without referring to my docs ) I believe mostly operated on lower frequency bands than US. It just seems rather less likely or certainly, uncommon
> [snip]
> --------------------------------
> Generally true.....US Subs used the AN/APR-1 (and -4 presumably) hunting IJN ships/submarines in the Pacific in WWII. ..In researching the AN/APR-1 that I am playing with I learned that the USS Batfish sank an IJN submarine after the APR-1 detected its 150 mc radar. Those IJN subs also carried 3 Gc radars, at least late-war. The APR-1 (SPR-1) could detect both radar band emissions. I would expect many other intercepts were made with this gear. It was a good passive system and the APR-4 variant was used well into the Vietnam war era aboard EB-66 aircraft, probably others.
> Some details if you're bored: http://www.n6cc.com/an-apr-1-apr-4-radar-comm-surveillance-receiver/ https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.n6cc.com%2Fan-apr-1-apr-4-radar-comm-surveillance-receiver%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4b4fed3bd7cc4fc7920308d8fa1d29d3%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637534350442030692%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=iI0xIOmyJ0pUZSAcL7PKTEhPEakarauAw96OCsAD1BA%3D&reserved=0
>
> Tim
> N6CC
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20210407/c90042df/attachment.html>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list