[ARC5] BC-453 drift test
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Thu Jan 11 12:42:37 EST 2018
On 11 Jan 2018 at 9:38, DSP3 wrote:
> I certainly concur. I run 4 receivers and use a nominal B+ of about
> 160v. Current measures about 40ma, max. There is no measurable
> drop in anything except perhaps total audio output power, certainly
> not sensitivity or BFO operation. The R-25A is used as a tunable IF
> for the ARC-2 and, as performed by others, find drift after a nominal
> worm-up time to be very, very low. Granted, digital usage is not a
> consideration at this QTH. That said, I also run B+ on BC-348
> receivers, et al, at about 180v with, again, no degradation.
> Jeep - K3HVG
As I have mentioned more than once here, I have found, after much experimentation, that
our receivers seem to work best at a voltage of about 180 VDC.
However, I also found that moving the screen voltage lead from the junction of the two big
black resistors in the rear to the "hot" end made a significant improvement in sensistivity
without degrading drift.
Looking at the specs for the 6/12SK7 tubes, we find that 180 V is "about right" for those
tubes' screen voltage. Typical specs are 100 V, but that would require changing resistor
values, and I believe in the KISS principle.
Ken W7EKB
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the ARC5
mailing list