[ARC5] BC-453 drift test

[J Mcvey]

No, most of those tank caps are mica. Generally they are usually OK. They don't leak but when they are  bad, they will either be intermittent ( silver migration), or shorted.The standard operating procedure is to change all of the paper and electrolytic caps in the "cans" . I cut them open with a pipe cutter, gut the contents and replace with either mylar or ceramics. The electrolytic cans get 105 degree types inside. Then I solder the can back together. looks like it never happened except for the thin band of solder.Hot air soldering makes the band almost disappear.Those bypass caps that I replaced are ALWAYS leaky and will mess with the tube biases, etc
 

    On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:59 PM, Tom Lee <tomlee at ee.stanford.edu> wrote:
 

  Yes, WSPR is definitely more challenging!
 
 The capacitors you changed -- I assume that a couple were part of the LO tank (say, C-8 and C-10 in the schematics I have). Is that right, or did changing others reduce the drift? I'm curious...
 
 Tom
 -- 
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Bldg., CIS-205
420 Via Palou Mall
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070
http://www-smirc.stanford.edu
650-725-3383 (public fax; no confidential information, please)  On 1/10/2018 5:24 PM, J Mcvey wrote:
  
  The test was done at a more or less arbitrary frequency. The LO started at 540Khz and ended up at 539.300Khz give or take a few hz. So, yes that would be about 0.13%.  However 700Hz and 1Hz/second  is a big deal with WSPR! Once it settles down, I can decode WSPR, though. The radio stabilizes faster now that the caps were all replaced. It used to take twice as long to get there. Going to give a try again tonight.
  
  
   
 
      On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 7:48 PM, Tom Lee <tomlee at ee.stanford.edu> wrote:
  
 
    Without knowing the LO frequency it's hard to give a precise answer, but that warmup drift represents roughly a couple tenths of a percent at midband. That sounds reasonable, as does the warmed-up drift. The dropping in frequency during warmup is consistent with the inductor and capacitor expanding as it heats up (L and C both increase under a linear expansion), so it makes sense.
 -- 
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Bldg., CIS-205
420 Via Palou Mall
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070
http://www-smirc.stanford.edu
650-725-3383 (public fax; no confidential information, please)   On 1/10/2018 3:45 PM, J Mcvey via ARC5 wrote:
  
  I recapped this radio and tested the LO drift afterwards. Coupling the plate via 7pf cap and a x10 scope probe to a frequency counter, the results were as  follows: The LO dropped in frequency at a rate of about 1 HZ / second upon power up. The drop rate slowed until it more or less stabilized an hour later 700 Hz lower than the start up measurement. Once at the bottom of the descent, it would sit and go up and down a couple of Hz in a very slow undulation. 
  I guess this a normal warmup scenario? What say you?
   
  
 ______________________________________________________________
ARC5 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
  
   ______________________________________________________________
 ARC5 mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
 
      
 
 

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20180111/957d0bcc/attachment.html>