[ARC5] Scott receiver
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Thu Nov 2 16:59:12 EDT 2017
On 2 Nov 2017 at 16:14, Christopher Bowne wrote:
> If you think the mixer hetrodyne oscillator is stable, and the BFO is the culprit, try injecting an
> external BFO signal from a good quality signal generator or synthesizer. That way you can take
> advantage of the observed better sensitivity of the command receiver. I currently use a Rockland
> 5100 synthesizer as a BFO for my Scott SLR-M not because of a stability issue, but because of
> the very low BFO injection level of the Scott's internal BFO.
I think you are one of the very first folks I have ever heard of who are actually USING a
Scott receiver.
I have two RCH receivers.
These are actually the Scott SLR-F. The RCH/SRL-F covers 80 to 560 kHz, and 1.9 to 24
MHz, skipping the BC band.
I had one when I was much younger and really liked its stability, excellent sound quality,
and ease of tuning (it has a big flywheel on the tuning mechanism), but it wasn't particularly
selective. I didn't think too much of the detector either: it was a 6H6.
One of the two I own now is very deaf. I suspect one of the bathtub capacitors in the RF
amp section is shorted, but have not yet tracked that down. This one also has a
replacement IF transformer, although that replacement is obviously from another Scott
receiver. Even so, the receiver will need a lot of TLC before I can install it in the rack and
fire it up. It is also missing some of its internal shielding. I think the previous owner was
trying to track the "deafness" down and gave up.
I have not so much as looked at the other one so far.
Thank you for mentioning your Scott.
Ken W7EKB
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the ARC5
mailing list