[ARC5] Frequency range of MF transmitters.
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Thu May 25 16:51:27 EDT 2017
On 25 May 2017 at 15:51, Mike Morrow wrote:
> I put all the nomenclatures, frequency ranges, IF frequencies,
> calibration crystal frequencies, etc. of these sets fram RAT to Type
> 11, ATA to AN/ARC-5 in a pdf file I posted here 13 months ago:
>
> http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20160425/24b17647/attachment-0001.pdf
Thank you, Mike. :-)
> AFAIK, all known non-VHF units are listed.
>
> > (Was there ever a T-14?).
>
> Yes...the T-14/TRC-1 70-100 MHz FM terminal set.
>
> http://radionerds.com/index.php/AN~TRC-1
>
> FWIW, the associated receiver is R-19/TRC-1.
Yes. As I mentioned to Robert, I should have remembered this.
> The first AN/ARC-5 receiver took the next JAN component number, R-20/ARC-5.
>
> Before the common well-known R-23/ARC-5, there were three
> communications receivers that were essentially nothing more than the
> ARA or RAV receiver with JAN name plates:
>
> R-20 1.5-3.0 Equiv. to ARA/RAV CBY-46104. Developed to R-25.
> R-21 3.0-6.0 Equiv. to ARA/RAV CBY-46105. Developed to R-26.
> R-22 6.0-9.1 Equiv. to ARA/RAV CBY-46106. Developed to R-27.
>
> These are very rare to non-existent today, like the RAV CBY-46107
> 9.0-13.5 unit that is the Holy Grill of command set lore. Gordon
> White may have the only remnants of one anywhere.
>
> Afterwards, we get to the common improved receivers R-23 through R-27.
>
> All are tabulated in the first link above.
>
> But...I digress.
>
> > Anyone help?
>
> Aren't you sorry you asked? :-)
Ha! Absolutely NOT! :-)
I expected nothing less from you, Michael, and again, thank you. I'll pass it on to someone
who asked me about this this morning.
vy 73 for now,
Ken W7EKB
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the ARC5
mailing list