[ARC5] The T-17 photo

[Leslie Smith]

  Thanks everyone!  The popular vote here - "5" - goes against my hunch
  - "3".

  Does this number (152 or 132) give a clue about the number of T-17
  that were produced?
  Would a single order (or many) have been placed for  T-15, T-16, T-17
  (etc)?

   73 de Les Smith
   vk2bcu at operamail.com

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017, at 07:38, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote:
> Looks like 142 or 152 to me.
> 
> 73
> Glenn
> WB4UIV
> 
> On 7/23/2017 5:24 PM, Leslie Smith wrote:
> > (pls see previous posting re serial number)
> > 
> >    73 de Les Smith
> >     vk2bcu at operamail.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > ARC5 mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> > 
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > 
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Glenn Little                ARRL Technical Specialist   QCWA  LM 28417
> Amateur Callsign:  WB4UIV            wb4uiv at arrl.net    AMSAT LM 2178
> QTH:  Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx)  USSVI LM   NRA LM   SBE ARRL TAPR
> "It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class
> of the Amateur that holds the license"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html