[ARC5] 60m band and SCR274 transmitters

[Bill Cromwell]

Hi Bob,

I think we have been saying the same thing with different words and from 
a different angle. It's the same result.

73,

Bill  KU8H

On 07/22/2017 05:10 PM, WA5CAB--- via ARC5 wrote:
> But the way that the rules were explained was that you could only or had
> to to be legal generate the signal using the USB channel of a SSB or ISB
> transmitter.  If the FSK signal is generated by feeding AFSK into an SSB
> transmitter, and receive it with an USB receiver, you will get the same
> results if you feed the normal AFSK into the USB transmitter or feed the
> inverted AFSK into the LSB channel.  And absent residual carrier to give
> it away, no one would be the wiser.  The same is true of CW whether
> generated the old way or the new way.
>
> Obviously you would in the "illegal" cases have to put the suppressed
> carrier in the wrong place.
>
> Robert Downs - Houston
> wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
> MVPA 9480
>
> In a message dated 07/22/2017 14:44:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
> wrcromwell at gmail.com writes:
>> If you swap the tones in the digital modes (inverted) both tones will
>> still be above the suppressed carrier for USB. With a plain, good, old
>> fashioned CW transmitter just put your signal 1500 Hz above the assigned
>> channel frequency. There are numerous ways to accomplish that. Some
>> people make it "complicated". As Bob points out..it's simple.
>>
>> Moving closer to 60 meter operation.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Bill  KU8H
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>

-- 
bark less - wag more