[ARC5] [Milsurplus] RAK question and RAL
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Tue Dec 26 13:04:34 EST 2017
On 25 Dec 2017 at 20:03, Bruce Gentry wrote:
> The 876 ballast was called a "Barretter" tube by RCA. It has an iron
> filament and is filled with hydrogen under pressure, it gets blazing hot
You can say that again!
> so it needs to be in a chimney enclosure of some sort or the glass will
> be strained and it will shatter- quite loudly.
Hydrogen in air is explosive. And the RAK/RAL power supplies do have a chimney of sorts.
The 876 is mounted in the exact center of the power supply, facing the back and is centered
in a chimney of sorts.
> Some early AC powered
> entertainment receivers that had direct heated filaments used the 876 to
> protect the tubes from voltage surges. The tube is used in a highly
> inefficient "brute force" circuit where most of the power goes to the
> resistor in series with the tube and the power transformer in paralell
> with the resistor just "goes along for the ride".
Yes. For OUR purposes, a total waste of power and a source of unneeded heat.
> I had an RAK and RAL
> (which I very foolishly traded away), and put a piece of fiber
> insulation under the center contact of the 876 after setting the switch
> to unregulated. I wanted to keep the tube in place for novelty and
> completeness of the power supply. Please do check the voltages in the
> power supply to see if today's 120 or more line voltage is too much even
> with the transformer taps set at their highest. I have not yet seen a
> regenerative receiver that works as well and is as easy to control the
> regeneration as these.
And I completely agree with you. In my opinion, the RAL is the very best HF regen I have
ever used, and the RAK is excellent at MF and VLF too.
> They may be archaic, but can be a very nice
> surprise.
As I've said before, I used my RAL-7 for something like 12 years as my only station receiver.
My ONLY complaint with it was the frequency readout, which was essentially non-existent. 0
- 10 and 0 - 100.
Other than that, it simply sat there and always worked.
I turned it off after about 8 years to check the tubes, found nothing wrong with them, so I
turned it back on and left if.
It has a certain "transparent" sound to it, like you are directly connected to the RF spectrum
with nothing in between you and the stations you are working.
I only wish it wasn't quite so big.
Ken W7EKB
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the ARC5
mailing list