[ARC5] Drift in BC-453 - more
Peter Gottlieb
kb2vtl at gmail.com
Sat Dec 16 18:31:46 EST 2017
That kind of drift can be compensated for in receiving software. Why it isn't is
a question for the developers. It's just a form of AFC.
On 12/16/2017 6:24 PM, J Mcvey via ARC5 wrote:
> Neil,
>
> Yup!
> I did mention 5Hz/minute.
> The radio works fine for CW because the drift is almost imperceptible to the
> human ear , but WSPR notices!
>
> I guess you haven't worked with waterfalls and these digital modes?
> The issue is obvious.
> This stuff requires a whole other level of timing and stability.
> I also said that I will do a an actual analysis when time permits...
>
> My hope was that someone other than myself is attempting to get a command set
> to receive WSPR and JTXX modes.
> Anybody?
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, December 16, 2017 5:53 PM, AKLDGUY . <neilb0627 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> The thread has meandered around because we haven't been given anything to go on.
> You have blamed the BFO but haven't mentioned any stability figure.
>
> Is the B+ feed to the BFO tube original? Are the resistors good? Have they been
> replaced by significantly different values? Is the decoupling to it still
> present? Are the
> caps bad?
>
> Sounds silly, but has a 6SR7 been fitted yet the heater line been rewired for
> 12V? Are
> you running 25V on the heater line and a wiring mistake has resulted in 25V on the
> 12SR7?
>
> I hope you've eliminated the painfully obvious.
>
> Neil ZL1ANM
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 3:50 AM, J Mcvey via ARC5 <arc5 at mailman.qth.net
> <mailto:arc5 at mailman.qth.net>> wrote:
>
> This thread has taken many meandering twists and turns.
> It all started when I suggested that BFO stability may be the reason that
> WSPR cannot be decoded with a commend reciever.
> Yes, it is a "hobby thing" where I aspire to make a complete 630 meter
> station from command components.
> One of the "Ham-mered' transmitters can be re purposed as the transmitter
> and the BC-453 as the receiver.
> The transmitter will be controlled by XCO or VCO with PLL.
>
> The computer systems drift ARE NOT the issue with WSPR. It works fine with
> other rigs.
> The BC453 LO "seems" to be stable if I leave it on a weak beacon station
> for a period of time.
>
> I built a 85 Khz fet Colpitts oscillator from some junk box components. I
> hope it will be more stable than the command set BFO, but
> it may have more phase jitter than I want. We'll see...
> It will be used to drive the grid of the existing BFO oscillator
> disconnected from the set's BFO can. The plate circuit will remain intact .
>
> I haven't had time to do the drift measurements on the BFO and LO yet,
> but I will get there eventually. Stay tuned...
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net <mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net/>
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Virus-free. www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the ARC5
mailing list