[ARC5] Zero Beat Question

[Michael Bittner]

The BCB Dx folks refer to this phenomenon as Sub-Audible Heterodynes.  Mike, W6MAB
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: D C _Mac_ Macdonald 
  To: WB6KBL Knoppow, Richard ; ARC-5 Mail List 
  Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 10:45 AM
  Subject: Re: [ARC5] Zero Beat Question


   
  As others have noted, as two signals get closer and closer 
  to equal, you can hear an increasingly slower wah-wah-wah 
  sound. The slower that sound gets, the closer you are to 
  true zero beat. 
   
  You can frequently hear this at night on an AM broadcast 
  radio when two fairly weak distant stations are within just 
  a very few Hz of each other. 
   
  It's a phenomenon with which we old farts and the primitive 
  gear which we used "way back then" are more familiar! 
   
  * * * * * * * * * * * 
  * 73 - Mac, K2GKK/5 * 
  * (Since 30 Nov 53) * 
  * Oklahoma City, OK * 
  * USAF, Ret'd 61-81 * 
  ** FAA, Ret'd 94-10 * 
  * * * * * * * * * * * 
   
   

   

  > To: arc5 at mailman.qth.net
  > From: 1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
  > Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:36:43 -0700
  > Subject: Re: [ARC5] Zero Beat Question
  > 
  > I have posted quite a bit on zero beating so this may be too much.
  > I learned the "three oscillator method" from a General Radio 
  > instruction book for a heterodyne frequency meter which was part of a 
  > frequency standard. The idea was to beat the unknown signal with a 
  > known marker and use a BFO such as that in a communication receiver or a 
  > regenerative detector set to just oscillate to give an audio beat that 
  > would wax and wane as the unknown beat against the signal from the 
  > interpolation oscillator. It is possible to match two frequencies to 
  > within a few Hz per _minute_ if a meter is used to watch the relative 
  > strength of the beat. This can be used to set the calibration oscillator 
  > in a communications receiver to WWV or some other high accuracy 
  > standard. The idea suggested by someone (should look it up) of using 
  > background noise is essentially the same thing, the noise taking the 
  > place of the third oscillator although it may be harder to hear. I just 
  > tried this on a Collins 51J-3 and it works very well.
  > There are probably other tricks.
  > 
  > -- 
  > Richard Knoppow
  > 1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
  > WB6KBL
  > ______________________________________________________________
  > ARC5 mailing list
  > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
  > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  > Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
  > 
  > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  ______________________________________________________________
  ARC5 mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net

  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20160711/979f669e/attachment.html>