[ARC5] [Milsurplus] roller inductors
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Tue Jan 26 00:38:46 EST 2016
Brian's suggestion that we all take a short course in electro
chemistry caused me to do a little searching. I have not yet found the
right material but the following might be of some interest:
http://lecturedemos.chem.umass.edu/electrochemistry19_4.html
On 1/25/2016 9:16 PM, Brian wrote:
> Please look up the electro-chemistry of silver. In particular, check
> the conductivity of silver sulphide - it is a semi-conductor. The myth
> of silver sulphide being a conductor seems to be promulgated /ad
> uendum/ by the chemically inert / unsophisticated. The removal of
> tetra-ethyl lead from petrol / gasoline has exacerbated the effect of
> sulphur oxides in the air where there are motor vehicles. Pure
> gasoline has no sulphur – the refiners add various compounds to
> promote their vision of economic glory. Silver oxide is almost as good
> a conductor as silver, but is of a similar colour. Only an analytical
> metallurgist or chemist can tell you what your specific tarnish is.
> The point I make is that the amount and kind of tarnish you get will
> depend on what’s in the air where your equipment resides.
> If your preferred ‘tarnish remover’ can convert silver sulphide back
> to pure silver and carry off the sulphur, what a lucky person you will
> be. So will your bank manager. Most ‘tarnish removers’ take away the
> silver sulphide and leave a larger surface area on the remaining
> silver – increased porosity – thus increasing susceptibility to
> air-borne tarnishers. If the silver is a 2 um to 20 um plating, then
> the tarnish remover may remove the silver completely and irreversibly.
> Silver sulphide is not the only tarnishing compound. However, proper
> design of silver-to-silver contacts can wipe away enough silver
> sulphide and other contaminants to redeem appropriate conductivity.
> Leaving an oil or grease layer on a roller inductor may protect the
> untouched underlying silver from air-borne attack. But as soon as you
> traverse the roller over the wound inductor, you reveal the underlying
> silver, allowing it to tarnish. This effect can be accelerated by
> traversing when high current is flowing, giving rise to sparking and
> formation of contamination. So, tune up at very low power!
> If all you want is a pretty-pretty roller inductor, then by all means
> polish it till it reflects and then coat it in a transparent varnish –
> but don’t expect it to work. If, on the other hand, you want your
> roller inductor to work, then attach a milli-Ohm meter between the
> roller support axle and one end of the inductor, traverse through the
> whole range of the inductor – perhaps a few times – observing in
> detail the resistance vs traverse position. Deal only with places on
> the inductor or the roller where resistance is unacceptable.
> There is a faint possibility you will be pleasantly surprised.
> 73 de Brian, VK2GCE.
> *On* Tuesday, January 26, 2016 1:14 PM, Bill said:
>
> It should be noted regarding these instructions to “Clean off the
> oxide” with Deoxit on the roller inductor, that silver tarnish is NOT
> an oxide, but a Sulfide. Silver Sulfide is CONDUCTIVE and is not the
> reason that the contacts are bad somewhere. Using any cleaner may
> also remove dirt and other contamination and Deoxit is as good as
> several others at doing this. I would use the DL100 Deoxit that does
> not have a small percent lubricant as does the D5 Deoxit. It is best
> to not leave any lubricant or anything at all on the contact.
>
> Many use just lab grade Isopropyl Alcohol for a cleaner. I use both
> and they both seem to work equally well.
>
> The following post in the thread after the Deoxit advice that suggest
> that the problem could be, and probably is, related to the follower
> spring contact on the contact bar is worth pursuing.
>
> While polishing the heck out of those roller contact areas may make
> you feel good, and it sure looks nice, it is a fool’s errand for the
> following reason. There is Sulphur in the atmosphere.. Some
> environments have it more than others. That is why your mother’s
> Silver tarnishes. When the Silver Sulfide forms, it uses up (eats up)
> a monolayer or two of Silver. The Silver Sulfide is more or less
> self-limiting. Once a layer of the Sulfide forms, it way slows down
> the process. When you shine it up, you remove all the Sulfide – which
> includes that Silver Plate monolayer – and the process starts all over
> again – at high speed… and the Silver plating gets thinner and
> thinner. This is not desirable.
>
> So, clean all the contaminants off the roller coil with either Deoxit
> or Isopropyl and then look for the other causes that may be there as
> suggested.
>
> By the way, do not even think about using Silver Polish.. That is a
> disaster – especially Tarnex or similar acidic processes.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
--
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
WB6KBL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20160125/57ad44f4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list