[ARC5] need advice on Tx tracking adjustment

[J Mcvey]

when I said 4khz end to end I meant that if I tune the dial at the top end (4 MHZ) to be dead on(zero beat) , then go all the way down to the low end (3mhz), I will find 3 mhz reading more like 3004 khz on the dial.  Obviously, the error progressively gets worse as I tune down the dial until it culminates in the 4khz error at the bottom end.This what I mean by dial tracking. It is said to "track" when the dial frequency and the actual frequency match exactly.

Bottom line; There is only one combination of L and the variable C where the frequency will correspond with all the tick marks on the dial.I was wondering what is the best way to proceed in finding that perfect combo.
I think the components have drifted over the years, but still well within tolerance to be tuned properly since the max error is only 4khz.
 

    On Saturday, August 20, 2016 2:45 AM, Leslie Smith <vk2bcu at operamail.com> wrote:
 

   Hello Jim,
  I need to check my understanding.
  Do you say that at every point on the dial the frequency is "off" by exactly 4.0kHz.

  You used the words, "end to end" - and these words give that idea.
  If that is the case, the dial itself is out of calibration.
  The set itself is accurately set up.
  If so case there should be a procedure to leave the oscillator tank components untouched and simply adjust the dial mechanism.   That's my take on this.   The problem seems to be related to the first point you made - that the locking screws were corroded in some way.

  However, my conclusion depends on my assumption - and that may be wrong.
  

   BW & 73 de Les Smith
   vk2bcu at operamail.com

   o-o-o


On Sat, Aug 20, 2016, at 14:21, J Mcvey via ARC5 wrote:

This particular BC-696 was supposed to be "government refurbished" in 1953. It was on a single  rack wrapped in heavy plastic.
The only problem was that whatever they used to clean it was not properly rinsed, so over the years in the bag, it ate the lock knobs and 
some of the case screws!
Fortunately, the innards were OK.

The problem is that the tracking is off 4 khz from end to end. The specs say that it should be within 200-300 cycles.
The osc trimmer was nearly all the way out of mesh, so I didn't have enough adjustment to bring it up to where it needed to be.
I set the trimmer at 50% and adjusted the main osc cap. That got it on frequency THERE, but the tracking is still go good

This stuff is notoriously tricky , so I consulted the manual.
Page 57 (of manual-PDF page  71) describes the process , but is very vague, talking about "changing the dial to the other side of the lowest frequency mark at a point about 
1 1/2 times from that mark as observed..."   WHAT???? This make no sense to me! 
Can someone explain what they mean in a coherent way?

Is it:
1) adjust to highest frequency (done!)
2) next,adjust the TX dial to find where the lowest frequency is shown on the dial.
3) if not tracking,note where the lowest frequeny is shown on the TX dial, and move the TX dial 1.5 times the error in the opposite direction.
4) adjust that new point to the lowest TX frequency with the osc coil.
5) Move the TX dial to properly indicate the lowest frequency
6) Use trimmer to tune to the lowest frequency.

I reworded it to accommodate modern test procedures using a frequency counter instead of "zero beat" 
Does this sound about right?

______________________________________________________________
ARC5 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
 
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - The professional email service

______________________________________________________________
ARC5 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20160820/702e1a5d/attachment-0001.html>