[ARC5] AM modulating an "ARC-5" transmitter...
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Mon Oct 12 20:35:01 EDT 2015
On 13 Oct 2015 at 10:33, Leslie Smith wrote:
> Robert (and others)
> I distrust this circuit. I suspect the circuit was never built and
> tested.
Which wouldn't be one bit unusual for that era. I found several modifications
which were published in nationally known ham magazines of that general
time period which were OBVIOUSLY never built since they could not have
worked as published.
> Does any-one here know of this circuit being used - either on a
> test-bench or actually on-air?
"Not I", said the Little Red Hen. ;-)
> The circuit lacks stability for the DC bias (operating) point. If
> used with a battery the operating point will drift as the battery
> voltage drops.
> The result? Either a low degree of modulation or splatter.
OK. Possibly...
> The claim that the circuit will operate with a crystal microphone
> seems to be unfounded - only Q4 supplies voltage gain; Q1 to 3 supply
> only current gain.
Again, maybe so. I'm not nearly as familiar with SS circuits as I am with
tubes.
> The operating bias for the 1625 will be somewhere between -35 and -65
> volts. If this modulator is to work it will need to supply a peak to
> peak signal AT LEAST 50% of that range.
OK. Sounds good.
> Without the benefit of "spice", - just looking at the circuit I would
> say, "No way."
Well, not with only 6 VDC on it, at least. That seems logical. But other issues
may be at play here. Aren't these transistors actually acting as some sort of
dynamic variable resistor?
> That's my assessment
Well taken. We need to run some tests.
As I said, I HAVE used the old tube-based "Simplest Modulator" and it works
just fine.
As soon as I can, I'll bread-board one of these SS units up and see what
happens in my DX-35, then will report here. I'll take "scope photos" too.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the ARC5
mailing list