[ARC5] ARC-5 as VFO

[Kenneth G. Gordon]

On 13 Nov 2015 at 14:31, AKLDGUY . wrote:

> That may be a bit unfair to Hallicrafters.

Well....no....

MOST of the early Hallicrafters receivers were notoriously unstable. I was 
amazed, since their transmitters were so stable.

The SX-28 was stable, but then Halli dropped the ball on receiver stability 
until their later receivers, when they became stable again.

The SX-100 was horrible that way. Both mechanically and electronically 
unstable. Tapping on the table was very obvious.

> In 1983, I bought a deceased estate SR-150 transceiver of 1963 vintage
> via a workmate and worked the world with it on 20m SSB with a dipole.

Yes, that was the era when stability returned to Halli rigs. The SX-101 and 
the SX-115, and SX-117 were good. Other cheaper receivers were terrible.

I am speaking from experience...

Ken W7EKB