[ARC5] Seeking Information: Article on the original ARC commercial Type D receiver

[AKLDGUY .]

> In the 30s, QST was considered a rigorous technical magazine. Even
through the 60s most technical libraries carried it
> as an engineering periodical and it was often referenced in peer reviewed
technical journals.

That function was taken over in recent decades by QEX magazine,
which is much more of an engineers' publication than the lighter-weight QST.

73 de Neil ZL1ANM


On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:24 PM, James Duffey <jamesduffey at comcast.net>
wrote: