[ARC5] Hacked transmitters - a question on modulation
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Sun Feb 22 15:34:08 EST 2015
Has anyone considered using controlled-carrier AM screen modulation with
our transmitters?
Since so many transmitters were originally set up for screen modulation, it
shouldn't be all that difficult to incorporate the controlled-carrier version.
The result should be at least 50% greater PEP output with no real increase
in plate dissipation. It would also work very well with a linear amp.
Furthermore, it seems to me that since CC modulation results in swings of
the AGC and "S" meter readings on the receiving end which would appear to
be much like an SSB or DSB signal, by carefully zero-beating the SSB signal
with whom you are attempting to communicate, the "other guy" may not even
realize, at least at first, that you are running AM.
I did this sort of thing "back in the day" when I had a Globe King 500C. I
used the transmitter's VFO in "spot" to demodulate the SSB signal on my
receiver with the BFO off. Tuning the VFO so that the SSB guys sounded as
natural as possible, and using a foot switch to mimic VOX, it usually took
considerable time before they would realize I was on AM.
In one instance, I had checked into a local SSB traffic net this way. After
some time had elapsed, one of the SSB guys on the net told me, "Ken, you
sure have a lot of carrier in there..."
My reply was, "Boy! I'd BETTER have!" :-)
He hesitated a bit, then said, "...wha..??? are you operating AM ?!?!?!?!"
I just laughed.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the ARC5
mailing list