[ARC5] 4th Receiver Drift Test from KE6F Hallicrafters S38B
D C _Mac_ Macdonald
k2gkk at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 3 17:50:07 EST 2015
I never noticed any drift or instability on my Walter Ashe WAR-25 regen receiver.
I still consider that it was a far better receiver on 80 and 40 than the S-38
receiver I borrowed when the 6SN7GT tube died and I didn't have the money for
a new tube!
It had a potentiometer to control the regen level and when set correctly, it
was definitely more selective than the S-38!
* * * * * * * * * * *
* 73 - Mac, K2GKK/5 *
* (Since 30 Nov 53) *
* k2gkk hotmail com *
* Oklahoma City, OK *
* USAF & FAA (Ret.) *
* * * * * * * * * * *
> From: wlfuqu00 at uky.edu
> To: millerke6f at aol.com; kb8tad at gmail.com; arc5 at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 20:52:07 +0000
> Subject: Re: [ARC5] 4th Receiver Drift Test from KE6F Hallicrafters S38B
>
> It was usable on CW, how many novice operators had S38 receivers? A lot of them.
> We were more tolerant to drift back in the 50's and 60's. I remember my electronics instructor
> showing me how he copied CW on his regen., since it had a wooden case and front panel, he would
> simply place his hand near the panel and move it back and forth to keep the cw pitch just where
> he wanted it. It was a digital, 5 digits, fine tuning device.
> 73
> Bill wa4lav
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: ARC5 [arc5-bounces at mailman.qth.net] on behalf of Bob via ARC5 [arc5 at mailman.qth.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 7:31 PM
> To: kb8tad at gmail.com; arc5 at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [ARC5] 4th Receiver Drift Test from KE6F Hallicrafters S38B
>
> To all on the S38B, Since the S38 did stay withing a couple of KHz of the desired frequency for at least 15-30 minutes it had no problem staying with a typical AM BC or SW station to include WWV at 5 and 10 MHz, As noted, the short term stability was ok for CW as the IF bandwidth of the rascal is quite wide so the Wet Ware in my head was able to track the CW note as it danced around a bit.
>
>
> 73
>
>
> Bob, KE6F
More information about the ARC5
mailing list