[ARC5] ARR-1

[jmfranke at cox.net]

Maybe because it is a convertor?


---- Ray Chase <raydio862 at verizon.net> wrote: 
> Now why would you say it is not really a receiver?  It receives an 
> electromagnetic wave from an antenna, amplifies it, detects it and passes on 
> the information.  That's a receiver in my book.
> Ray
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Robert Eleazer" <releazer at earthlink.net>
> To: <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARC5] ARR-1
> 
> 
> > The amusing thing about the ARR-1, is that it received the very first 
> > receiver designation, R-1, as well  as the first ARR designation.
> >
> > And it's not even really a receiver.
> >
> > I've always wondered if that designation was part of the subterfuge or 
> > reflected that the CV designation had not come into use yet.
> >
> > Also, does anyone know if the 520-1.5 set used with the ARR-1 was ever 
> > used for anything but the IF of the ZB system?
> >
> > Wayne
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > ARC5 mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html