[ARC5] Selectivity and the BC-455
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Fri Oct 24 11:48:29 EDT 2014
On 24 Oct 2014 at 5:21, DSP3 wrote:
> Ken,
>
> Now that's a new twist on the subject. Truth told, I have never seen a
> single-coil ARC-5/274-N receiver, but then again, its only recently that
> I've been actually disassembling them. If there is only one coil, no
> wonder the selectivity is "less than what might be desired". Which
> manual carries that design, if you or anyone can pass on?
I don't know which manual has schematics of this issue, so I will have to go
try to dig those out. But I CAN show all and sundry photos of such a can.
I'll have to dig THAT can out too.
I know I was very surprised to find this issue when I began my investigation
of how to improve the selectivity of our favorite receivers. I had planned the
exact same solution that you came up with, and at the time, due to the
almost non-existent selectivity of the "40 meter" receivers, I started with that
one.
In addition, in that youtube video by Mike Murphy WU2D, a link to which I
posted here, Mike mentions that the 2830 KHz IF cans HE first disassembled
also had only one coil, and is the reason he built the crystal-filter.
So, I am not "blowing smoke". It is simply a fact.
As a matter of fact, the very first 2830 KHz IF can I ever disassembled had
only one coil. From that, I deduced, incorrectly as it turns out, that ALL 2830
KHz IF cans had one coil, and is the sole reason I switched my efforts to the
receivers which have 1415 KHz IFs.
Therefore, I was more than a little surprised to find that you worked the same
magic on your 2830 IFs that you had on the 1415 KHz IFs.
In fact, I was actually quite satisfied with the selectivity of the 3 - 6 MHz
receivers, since I spend most of my time on CW. In my opinion, they work
just fine for that mode. They are a little broad, but still acceptable and
useable.
The 6 - 9.1 MHz receivers are another story...
Ken W7EKB
More information about the ARC5
mailing list