[ARC5] 400784741321
AKLDGUY .
neilb0627 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 16 17:38:11 EDT 2014
> Your assumption that ARC used the condenser (part #6558) from the 6 to
9.1 (#46106) rig is incorrect.
> The RAV(#46109) which tunes 20 to 27 mcs uses a unique condenser (#4609).
Well, that answers that question, thank you very much.
And I assumed nothing.
I **suggested** a reason for A.R.C. using fewer turns on the coils.
Don't read into what I wrote what's not there.
> While Ken was telling us about his struggle with the 3 to 6 rig, some pix
of this unique item were posted
> (constructed of ‘unobtainium’).
So what? We can't all be expected to keep files that we were not
particularly interested in.
> Ken was working with a BC454 which uses another condenser (#4601).
So what? That came to light only after I started my suggested modification.
By then, I was well into describing the modification *for the 6-9.1 MHz
model".
> BTW the IF of the 20/27 rig is 4200 kcs and Mr. White very nicely
outlined why this is so in the article
> Command Set Receivers for all Frequencies.
Again, so what? My modification is based on the 6-9.1 MHz model. Irrelevant.
73 de Neil ZL1ANM
More information about the ARC5
mailing list