[ARC5] "Curing Chirp in Command Transmitters"
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Sun Oct 5 13:36:48 EDT 2014
On 5 Oct 2014 at 10:46, Bill Cromwell wrote:
> Whooping, yooping, and drooping are very poor practice.
I ABSOLUTELY agree...and it is totally unnecessary to boot.
> That musical fifth will qrm other qso's in progress as will more serious,
> slower drift.
Yes...and the drift is unnecessary also.
> On the other hand having some "character" can help us sort out
> the signals in a busy band because they stand out.
Again, yes....but that is "some" character, not some horrible sounding crap.
What has never ceased to bother me and I don't understand it, is that some
old timers LIKE to hear those horrible signals. Many of the really-OT in the
Antique Wireless Association have expressed such thoughts, and, again, I
don't understand their thinking.
It is prefectly possible to make, for instance, a 1929 TNT sound at least as
good as a modern rice box....or even a little better.
Ask Carl KM1H: he made DXCC using such a rig, and no one whom he
contacted even bothered to ask him what he was using except ONE
contact...who then expressed considerable surprise and asked many more
questions.
W7QQQ Jack Meadows routinely uses a pair of 809s in a TNT configuration
on both 80 and 40 meters. I have worked him and can assure you that his rig
sounds literally beautiful: no chirp, no clicks, no drift and a beautiful almost
bell-like tone with a very little "character".
If it can be done with a 1929 design, it sure as heck can be done with an
"ARC-5" transmitter, and it SHOULD be done!!!
IMHO, there is simply no excuse for crappy sounding signals.
And, IMHO, there is no need for fancy "chirp reduction techniques" with the
rig either. :-(
Ken W7EKB
More information about the ARC5
mailing list