[ARC5] Tuning Cable Question
Mike Hanz
aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org
Fri May 30 22:42:07 EDT 2014
And I would respectfully point out that the dichotomy existed long
before the war began. The "working Bendix standard" was an accepted
industry standard *before* Bendix started using it. I think Gordon
White put his finger on the issue. Managing a group of engineers
provided me with an interesting perspective: when one is surrounded by
a large numbers of alligators in the swamp you are trying to drain, then
one holds fast to things that, while not exactly optimum for the
purpose, at least "ain't entirely broke". Faced with the rapid
development of aircraft radio in the early 1930s, it is no wonder that
engineers simply slapped the prevailing wisdom about tuning cables on
the BOM for the project of the moment. Easy and simple, no? Bendix
simply carried on that time honored tradition.
Gordon's point about the ARC Type K was that it was a new "miniaturized"
radio, and as we have long since begun to appreciate, Dr. Drake was a
superb *systems* engineer. It seems clear that his company offered him
the opportunity to reassess the engineering of each and every component
of the system. That obviously included the drive cable design.
Otherwise he would have stuck with the prevalent choice, and said, "Done!"
So, it would be my conjecture that it was a seminal moment when ARC
management provided the spark of "do your best" that led to the change
in sheath diameter. I don't blame Bendix engineers for sticking with
the old technology. Aircraft were becoming more powerful and able to
lift heavier weights, so why adopt a new design in the late 1930s? Why
even change well into the 1940s? *That* is where you get the "doncha
know there's a war on" attitude.
Anyway, that's my story and I'm stickin' to it...:-)
- Mike
On 5/30/2014 9:04 PM, J. Forster wrote:
> I'd put it a bit differently.
>
> Since a working Bendix standard EXISTED, there was no pressing need to
> invent something. Furthermore, any 'improvement' would not be very much
> better.
>
> After all, there was a war on.
More information about the ARC5
mailing list