[ARC5] Tuning Cable Question
WA5CAB--- via ARC5
arc5 at mailman.qth.net
Fri May 30 18:22:55 EDT 2014
AFAIK, the larger spline was used on everything that flew and used tuning
cables except for the Type K derived sets. No one seems to know why the
small sets used the small spline.
Robert D.
In a message dated 05/30/2014 17:10:03 PM Central Daylight Time,
aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org writes:
> On 5/30/2014 1:04 PM, Robert Eleazer wrote:
> >As we all know the tuning knobs for the earlier TRF radios like the RU
> and SCR-283 are larger than the ones used for the SCR-274-N and ARC-5 types.
> As I found to my dismay when I bought a tuning knob in a store in San
> Diego many years ago, only to find it would not fit the radios I had.
> >
> >Is this because the TRF sets had more mechanical stuff to turn than the
> superhets and thus needed cables capable of handling the extra load?
>
> If it were a function of load, wouldn't the inner phosphor bronze flex
> drive cable be larger in diameter than the ones in the command set
> drives? (It's not...they are both ~.148"OD) What is somewhat
> inexplicable is why the earlier cables had a larger diameter sheath than
> those for the command sets, and thus needed a larger connecting nut,
> which forced the spinner knob to be larger, and the knee bone is
> connected to the thigh bone, and....
>
> >I guess that same kind of cable is used on the ARN-6 as well.
>
> As well as all the Bendix control boxes.
>
> - Mike KC4TOS
More information about the ARC5
mailing list