[ARC5] Tuning Cable Question
Geoff
geoffrey at jeremy.mv.com
Fri May 30 13:48:53 EDT 2014
> On 5/30/2014 1:04 PM, Robert Eleazer wrote:
>> As we all know the tuning knobs for the earlier TRF radios like the RU
>> and SCR-283 are larger than the ones used for the SCR-274-N and ARC-5
>> types. As I found to my dismay when I bought a tuning knob in a store in
>> San Diego many years ago, only to find it would not fit the radios I had.
>>
>> Is this because the TRF sets had more mechanical stuff to turn than the
>> superhets and thus needed cables capable of handling the extra load?
>
> If it were a function of load, wouldn't the inner phosphor bronze flex
> drive cable be larger in diameter than the ones in the command set drives?
> (It's not...they are both ~.148"OD) What is somewhat inexplicable is why
> the earlier cables had a larger diameter sheath than those for the command
> sets, and thus needed a larger connecting nut, which forced the spinner
> knob to be larger, and the knee bone is connected to the thigh bone,
> and....
>
>> I guess that same kind of cable is used on the ARN-6 as well.
>
> As well as all the Bendix control boxes.
>
> - Mike KC4TOS
Did they originally simply use what was on most auto radios thru to the late
30's? A dashboard or steering column mounted tuning head with 2 cables to
the firewall mounted electronics box.
Carl
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the ARC5
mailing list