[ARC5] BC sets and others.
Geoff
geoffrey at jeremy.mv.com
Tue Jan 21 20:28:30 EST 2014
The 262 kc was to sharpen the passband to minimize interference when driving
close to a transmitter site. The RF stage contributed to image rejection
lost by going to 262 kc.
Some home and auto radios in the early 30's were even 175kc and National
built RAS, a WW2 HRO-Jr for the Navy with 175 kc so it would cover the 200kc
and up range used.
In the 20's when the superhet was in its infancy IF's as low as 13 kc were
used and many others up to 100kc were common. Technology didnt exist yet to
make selective IF transformers.
Carl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Eleazer" <releazer at earthlink.net>
To: <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: [ARC5] BC sets and others.
>I have two of the BC band sets, both of which are in pretty good shape,
>only a couple of extra holes drilled in the case on one. One is missing
>its BFO coil and I think I'll order one for it from Fair Radio. And of
>course I have that extra BC band tuning dial as well as some spare 239 KHZ
>IF transformers from another BC set that someone had hacked up and added a
>transformer and power supply - I turned it on only one time and it started
>smoking, so that was the end of that.
>
> I have found two different BC band conversions for BC-453's. One tells
> you how to modify all the coils, including the IF transformers (but not
> the BFO). The other just has you modify the RF section coils and leave
> the 85 KHZ IF alone - I wonder how the image rejection is on that one.
>
> Geoff:
>
> Yes, in general, it seems that automobile radios of any era are head and
> shoulders above the rest of the crowd. Making even a decent AM BCB radio
> seems to be a lost art and making a really good one is almost unheard of.
> My NC-190 is far better than anything you are likely to find in that
> regard, but of course it uses an external antenna. Especially disturbing
> is the slapdash dial calibration on so many of them.
>
> I wonder though, why was 262 KHZ chosen for the older automobile radio
> IF's? Somewhere lost in all my junk is a 262 KHZ transistorized AM radio
> IF; I would imagine those are especially rare.
>
> Wayne
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3681/7023 - Release Date: 01/21/14
>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list