[ARC5] Looking at a 70 year old BC-457
MillerKE6F at aol.com
MillerKE6F at aol.com
Mon Jan 20 14:57:14 EST 2014
With the continued interest in these critters I thought it might be of some
interest to see how well this rascal was holding up after almost 70 years,
most of which was spent sitting on my shelf. This unit had not seen too
many modifications those being the filaments rewired for 12 volts, a final
amp key jack installed, the eye tube circuit disconnected. Otherwise no
other changes. The frequency range remained in the 4-5.3 MHz category. My
measurements were made at a nominal 3.950000 MHz. The first performance
parameter to come to mind was how stable was the VFO. I used a regulated 12
vdc power supply for the filaments and a regulated 200 vdc for the oscillator
plates. No final 1625s were installed during these tests. Frequency
measurements were made with an HP 5340A frequency counter with an external
rubidium standard. I should mentioned that the VFO remained operational on
Plate Voltages as low as 12VDC although the output level was marginal.
Short term stability did not seem too much affected by the plate voltage be
it 12VDC, 100 VDC or 200 VDC. The remainder of the frequency stability
was done with a regulated 200 VDC source.
1. Drift (Downward) over a 14 hour overnight period was 1359 Hz with an
ambient temperature range (rough measurements) from 58 degree F down to 42
degrees F.
2. Short term drift over 30 minutes (58 degrees F) 4 Hz
3. Variation with plate voltage 150 VDC Ep shift upward 190 Hz (from 200
vdc Ep reference)
4. Variation with plate voltage 100 VDC Ep shit upward 442 Hz (from 200
vdc Ep reference)
5. Filament voltage lowered to 10VDC Ep 200 VDC (10 minutes to soak up
change) 56 Hz drift downward
6. Filament voltage raised to 14VDC Ep 200 VDC (10 minutes to soak up the
change) 11 Hz drift upward
Conclusions at this point in the adventure are that the VFO section is not
affected all that much by operating parameters such as plate voltage or
filament voltage. Temperature seems to be the major player and when the unit
is fully operational with final tubes in place (Big Heat Source being
located next to the VFO can) I will rerun the stability tests.
I will be running the transmitter on a home brew power supply that
duplicates the dynamotor voltage employed in the original scheme. The Filament
string will be returned to Nominal 24 vdc and powered from a regulated DC
module in the AC power supply. I hope to substantiate (for my own
edification) just how practical it is to use these units as built and also look into
a number of the modifications that were made to these units over the years
to include keying and final amplifier tweaks. Also spectrum analysis of
the output signals when feeding typical 50 ohm loads and methods used to match
these loads. I have a fairly large collection of "Modified Units" which I
can modify further to check the viability of TVI modifications, Buffer
amplifiers to mitigate chirp and pulling and other sane changes that might
enhance these gems from the past. I also have a number original units both
274/N and ARC-5 to test and evaluate. I realize that this is ground that's
been plowed many times, but I'm not convinced that these units are ready to
put on the shelf as ornaments of a bygone era. I'm driven by my memories
of using these rascals some 50 years ago. Then more out of necessity being
a cash strapped kid. I would also be interested to read the findings of
other folks who have wrenched on these transmitters along with their findings
73
Bob, KE6F
More information about the ARC5
mailing list