[ARC5] A simple receiver improvement

[Geoff]

But you havent run them on a network analyzer to see what they really do, 
first into purely resistive loads and then into highly reactive ones, you 
may be surprised that there is no balun action at all at the lower 
frequencies and a junk box capacitor can produce the same results.

Carl


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glen Zook" <gzook at yahoo.com>
To: "Glen Zook" <gzook at yahoo.com>; <kgordon2006 at frontier.com>; "Ian Wilson" 
<ianmwilson73 at gmail.com>; "aRC-5 List" <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ARC5] A simple receiver improvement


Carl:

The sensitivity improvements are definitely NOT imaginary! The improvements 
have been measured, numerous times, using well calibrated signal generators 
such as Motorola (Systron Donner), Singer-Gertsch, IFR, etc. service 
monitors as well as with older, but still well calibrated signal generators, 
like the HP-606, HP-608, URM-25 series, TS-497 series, Measurements Models 
65 and 80, and so forth.

That is, running 50-ohm, unbalanced, matched impedance signals into the 
balanced terminals (with A-2 grounded) per "normal" practice and then with 
the television balun inserted with the A-2 terminal not connected to ground.

I agree that building baluns that are specifically matched to the actual 
impedance of a particular receiver and to 50-ohm coaxial cable should 
produce even better sensitivity. However, for less than $1.00 for the 
television balun, the improvement in usable sensitivity is generally 
remarkable and building more accurate baluns is not usually worth the effort 
and cost versus the additional apparent gain.

Glen, K9STH


Website:  http://k9sth.com



On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 5:31 PM, Glen Zook <gzook at yahoo.com> wrote:

The Hammarlund receivers, up to, and including, the HQ-150 (also includes 
the HQ-100 and HQ-110 which are later receivers) have balanced antenna 
inputs up to 600-ohms and the baluns should definitely help. The HQ-160 has 
an antenna impedance of around 75-ohms unbalanced and the HQ-170 series and 
HQ-180 series have an antenna impedance of 100-ohms balanced / unbalanced 
(depends on if the A-2 terminal is connected to ground). With those 
receivers, using a television balun probably wouldn't do much good.

Glen, K9STH


Website: http://k9sth.com



On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 3:35 PM, Kenneth G. Gordon 
<kgordon2006 at frontier.com> wrote:

On 14 Jan 2014 at 12:56, Ian Wilson wrote:

> Ken,
>
> In principle you could just use an L-network or something to couple
> more energy from the antenna to the tuned circuit of the first RF
> stage. However .. this will reduce the selectivity of that tuned
> circuit, so you may run into diminishing returns.
>
> 73, ian K3IMW

That is an idea.

However, I looked up some balun design math.

Z2 = n^2*Z1

where n = the turns ratio, Z2 = one impedance and Z1 = the other.

n in this case turns out to be about 4.4

This means that one would wind 5 turns on the "primary" side, and 22 turns
on the secondary side to achieve a 50:4.1K balun.

Now I have to figure out which mix of toroid I would have to use.

This seems do-able and small enough.


Ken W7EKB
______________________________________________________________
ARC5 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
ARC5 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
ARC5 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/7003 - Release Date: 01/14/14