[ARC5] SCR-274N Antenna Matching and Mark's transmitters
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Fri Aug 22 11:39:37 EDT 2014
On 21 Aug 2014 at 21:33, Dennis Monticelli wrote:
> Ian,
Hi, Dennis:
That was Mark who was having the very low plate efficiency, not Ian.
> Something is definitely not right. Assuming you are getting adequate drive to a
> decent set of 1625's, you should be seeing a lot higher plate efficiency.
I agree. Mark's plate efficiency is way too low. I am wondering if his
wattmeter is reading low for some reason?
> On a T-22 I use a series cap of 100pF from the antenna post to a 50 ohm
> antenna and a shunt 390pF from the secondary of the variometer to ground.
> The L setting is 23. With a regulated 500V (exact) on the plates and 263V
> regulated to the screens the Ip is exactly 100mA dipped.
That is 50 watts input. Sounds good to me.
> I measure power out as
> 30W on an accurate power meter. That's a plate efficiency of 60%, which is what
> I would expect from two parallel 807 types on a 500V rail whose grids are
> properly driven.
Agreed.
I wonder what is going on with Mark's setup?
Mark could connect the transmitter to a 50 ohm dummy load, and then, with
an accurate oscilloscope, measure the peak-to-peak voltage, then from that,
calculate his true power output.
P=E^2/R.
If I remember correctly, "E" is RMS, which means that he would divide his
P-P voltage by 2.828. R=50.
Or if he used a VTVM with an RF probe, he would be measuring RMS
voltage directly.
This would give him a check on his wattmeter, at least.
As you point out, his plate efficiency is extremely low, if his wattmeter is
reading accurately.
Something is definitely not right.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the ARC5
mailing list