[ARC5] OT? bc-348 bfo question
Fernando - LU2DFM
lu2dfm at gmail.com
Sun Sep 15 20:31:09 EDT 2013
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:59:03PM +0000, Fuqua, Bill L wrote:
> That will work for CW just fine since distortion is not an issue.
> It should be more for AM. Just depends how much of the muffled
> AM detected SSB you are willing to tolerate.
Yes, of course.
This thread and my question, however are not about the detectors in
general, but about the peculiarities of the BC-348's circuit in
particular. I'm interested on understanding the designers criteria and
trying to get a feeling of how these radios where operated in their
time.
I was pretty sure the BFO injection level on my radio was too much low
for normal use, let alone the noisy environment they where intended
to work on. I think these radios where operated at full or near full
volume much of the time, there is no reason for low injection-low RF
gain CW operation when it's possible to make a variable injection level
control or simply put much more signal in the FI.
Thank you for your insight.
--
73 de Fer, LU2DFM
More information about the ARC5
mailing list