[ARC5] OT? bc-348 bfo question
Fernando - LU2DFM
lu2dfm at gmail.com
Sat Sep 14 09:03:58 EDT 2013
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 08:29:10AM -0400, D. Platt wrote:
> All of you guys have it right. The BFO injection needs to be
> upwards of 25% to 50% of the received signal level, at the point of
> mixing. Unfortunately, the BFO signal is fixed and one must use the
> RF gain to bring that ratio back into some sort of reasonable
At full level, the BFO just gets in the verge of 50% of FI signal level
only for mid level signals at the antenna. But this is perhaps ok.
The BFO level, however, is not fixed in MVC position, the Vp
of the BFO osc. triode is the MVC line controlled voltage.
> number, but at the expense of gain. Increasing the BFO injection
> will certainly help. Its only when signals are at or near the
> receiver MDS that too much BFO can be a negative factor. Truth
> told, I really don't know what the actual ratios are in these old
> radio sets. I read somewhere that only a very small percentage of
> signal voltage is required to provide a usable CW note. I'd be
> curious to know what results you find in the BC-348. I know that in
> receivers such as the S-40( ) and the SX-99, twisting the gimmick to
> twice the turns does, in fact, help.
I'm suspecting same thing here. Besides that, the gimmick in my rx is
barely 1/2 turn.
Thanks.
--
73 de Fer, LU2DFM
More information about the ARC5
mailing list